FrenzyLeagues
Open analyzer

Amon-Ra St. Brown vs CeeDee Lamb

Amon-Ra St. Brown prices 4.0 points higher for dynasty. Full tale of the tape below, then model the deal yourself.

Player comparison

Metric WR Amon-Ra St. Brown WR CeeDee Lamb
Team DET DAL
Position WR WR
Age 26 — leads 27
Redraft value 78.4 — leads 74.4
Dynasty value 78.4 — leads 74.4
VORP (redraft) 63.3 — leads 59.3
VORP (dynasty) 65.7 — leads 61.6

Highlighted cells mark the stronger figure for that metric. For age, lower is treated as the advantage in dynasty formats.

Model this trade

Both players are already loaded. Add picks or extra pieces to either side to find the package that balances the deal.

League settings

Team A receives

78.4pts

Type to search players, then use the arrow keys and Enter to add one to Team A.

  • WRAmon-Ra St. BrownDET · Age 2678.4

Team B receives

74.4pts

Type to search players, then use the arrow keys and Enter to add one to Team B.

  • WRCeeDee LambDAL · Age 2774.4

Verdict

Team A favoured

Net value · Team A

+4.0

Fairness

95%

RecommendationTeam B should request a 2nd or 3rd round draft pick to balance this trade.

Frequently asked

Who has more dynasty value, Amon-Ra St. Brown or CeeDee Lamb?
Amon-Ra St. Brown carries the higher dynasty value: 78.4 against 74.4, a gap of 4.0 points on our 0–100 superflex scale. Amon-Ra St. Brown is 26 and CeeDee Lamb is 27, and dynasty pricing applies position-specific age decay on top of a market-derived value curve, not fantasy point projections.
Which player is better for redraft leagues?
For win-now redraft leagues, Amon-Ra St. Brown is worth more: 78.4 against 74.4. Redraft strips out the age-decay term entirely, which is why the two formats can disagree on the same pair of players.
How does league size affect this trade?
Value is measured against the replacement-level starter at each position, and that baseline moves with league size. In a 14-team league the waiver pool is thin, so established starters like these hold more relative value. In an 8-team league the drop-off to a replacement WR is much smaller, which compresses the gap and makes draft picks comparatively more attractive.

Related trades